Re: Nature of the group

From: jonmmorris@aol.comnospam (JonMMorris)

Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000

Steve T wrote:

>>A commercial game publisher colleague of yours once told me that he
intentionally kept the existence of this newsgroup (and competing games) as
secret as possible.  Perhaps he was not confident his games would stand up to
the competition.<<

>The commercial hobby is split between the companies who think that ''insular''
is best and keep PBM's 'width'' secret from their players to prevent
player-loss, and companies which tell their players everything they can about
the hobby because they believe that this will cause the hobby to grow and have
a benefit to them later on because of this.

>I used to be one of the latter.  These days I've moved a little over and
believe there is some happy ground between the two.  But the former seems like
a mad strategy to me, even though I can see *why* they think that, I still
think they are ultimately making a mistake.

>Of course, the biggest PBM company in the world practices the 'insular' method
proudly and they are still the biggest, so maybe Im wrong. <grin>

>Steve T.

You probably have an idea who are your competitors and how you compare with
them.  What are the things that distinguish your games and would prompt others
to recommend your games over your competitors'?

--John
*** Remove "nospam" from the e-mail address to reply.
     (AD) Gunboat Empires is moving from PbM to the web
     http://members.aol.com/gunboatemp                      ***

References

Re: Nature of the group
madcentral@aol.com (MadCentral)
Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: Nature of the group
madcentral@aol.com (MadCentral)
Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000