Re: Olympia: declared attitudes

From: sjc@cs.purdue.EDU (Steve Chapin)

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 1992 21:49:25 +0000

}} In article <1992Jul13.152356.22350@walter.cray.com> rsocia@alberti.cray.com (Rick Socia) writes:
}}
}} I agree with Russell.  The current scheme is simple, and is preferred (providing
}} you make unfriendly and hostile work).  The orcs and savages are using it quite
}} nicely and doing quite well I might add (Dr. Pain reincarnate).
}}
}} However, if it is changed, what choice do we have but to use it, even though it
}} violates the surface simplicity rule.

The thing that got left out (I think) was that I had proposed leaving
in a

declare XXX friendly

which maps onto

declare xxx yyyy

where yyyy is the string for "stack, get, give, neutral"; I can't
remember the letters.

Thus, we could still provide conveniently packaged higher level attitudes.

}} Rick Socia

sjc@cs.purdue.edu               Steve Chapin           Today's Grammar Lesson:
       "If you loose your arrow, you're likely to lose it in the weeds,"
                       was often heard in days of yore.

If I don't want it in my back yard, I don't want it.

References

Olympia: declared attitudes
skrenta@rt.com (Rich Skrenta)
Mon, 13 Jul 1992 15:52:49 +0000
Re: Olympia: declared attitudes
rwallace@unix1.tcd.ie (russell wallace)
Mon, 13 Jul 1992 17:52:24 +0000
Re: Olympia: declared attitudes
rsocia@alberti.cray.com (Rick Socia)
Mon, 13 Jul 1992 15:23:55 +0000