Re: DM: First Roll-ups

From: johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John White)

Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 01:08:18 +0000

In article <1ecrg2INNgbt@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert
Charles Lebeau) writes:
>>>9-10-13-11-16-3-8  He looks like the best of the group. Something like
>>> a 9-10-13-17-17-7-11 ?
>>
>>You can do this, but the last two points would do much more good in deft
>>than in speed.  MUCH more good.  Even if you wanted to make a lunger out
of
>>this guy (not the best you could do).  I would go 9-10-13-17-17-5-13
waste.
>	I have had a lot of expierence (not in spelling but in) running
>wastes, and I have found that wastes should always (unless absolutely
>unavoidable) start with at least an 11 str.  Any less than that and they
>can't use any of the good waste weapons except scimitar.  I'd set this
>one up -> 11-10-13-17-17-5-11 .  You start with a few less skills but
>the bigger selection of weapons, better chance to do more damage, better
>carrying capacity, etc make up for it, and you won't have to waste 2-4
>turns training your strength and that will make up for the lost skills.

Hmmm... of course your experience overshadows mine, but I would be
interested in finding out about a 9-10-13-17-21-3-11 Waste.

I'm no big fan of the 3 speed warrior, but in the case of a waste, I might
be tempted.  You could train up strength in 2 turns, get good-great damage,
1 con train from normal carry, and start with a 21 will which might make the
difference between a so-so waste and a pretty good one.

John

References

Re: DM: First Roll-ups
rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau)
Wed, 18 Nov 1992 07:31:14 +0000

Referenced By

Re: DM: First Roll-ups
rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau)
Wed, 18 Nov 1992 07:31:14 +0000