Re: DM: First Roll-ups

From: rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau)

Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 07:31:14 +0000

>>Ok, I just got my first roll-ups in the mail and figured Id see if
>>anyone out there could give me some help with them.
>
>>11-12-15-9-10-4-9  Maybe 11-12-15-15-15-5-11  WS?
>
>Yes.
	I second that.  This will be a good (but not spectacular waste,
don't bother training any of the stats for a long time, just plug away
at skills.
>
>>9-10-13-11-16-3-8  He looks like the best of the group. Something like
>> a 9-10-13-17-17-7-11 ?
>
>You can do this, but the last two points would do much more good in deft
>than in speed.  MUCH more good.  Even if you wanted to make a lunger out of
>this guy (not the best you could do).  I would go 9-10-13-17-17-5-13 waste.
	I have had a lot of expierence (not in spelling but in) running
wastes, and I have found that wastes should always (unless absolutely
unavoidable) start with at least an 11 str.  Any less than that and they
can't use any of the good waste weapons except scimitar.  I'd set this
one up -> 11-10-13-17-17-5-11 .  You start with a few less skills but
the bigger selection of weapons, better chance to do more damage, better
carrying capacity, etc make up for it, and you won't have to waste 2-4
turns training your strength and that will make up for the lost skills.

Airagon

rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu

References

DM: First Roll-ups
hturowsk@nyx.cs.du.edu (Hank Turowski)
Sun, 15 Nov 1992 22:18:18 +0000
Re: DM: First Roll-ups
johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John White)
Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:04 +0000

Referenced By

DM: First Roll-ups
hturowsk@nyx.cs.du.edu (Hank Turowski)
Sun, 15 Nov 1992 22:18:18 +0000
Re: DM: First Roll-ups
johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John White)
Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:04 +0000