Re: DM: Roll-Up: Scum?

From: itlm013@dale.ucdavis.edu (Donnie Trump)

Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1993 19:40:32 +0000

In article <1993Apr20.180517.12534@news.tufts.edu> gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris) writes:
>	Well, just got a turn back, having done well, 3-2-1, 10-5-2 over the
>last three.  I did have a warrior killed, but it was a 3-0 dixie slasher, so
>it's a good thing since it lets me bloodfeud (unless they DA, which they
>should).
>
>	Anyway, the upshot of all this is I've got a new roll-up to play
>with.  Let me give you a peek:
>
>	3-15-12-10-14-8-8

Hmm.  Let's try...

TP
ST  3 + 2 =  5
CN 15 + 0 = 15
SZ 12 + 0 = 12
WT 10 + 3 = 13/15
WL 14 + 3 = 17
SP  8 + 1 =  9
DF  8 + 5 = 13/11

This character isn't "exactly" a scum.  It's what I call a Small Shield
Total Parry - really only able to use the small shield, or short sword
(also daggers).  This is an interesting set-up (to me, at least) because
it relies on overall defensive ability, with the ability to take damage
as needed.  It won't have a lot of offensive capabilities, not right away
at least, but in the future he should be able to take out offensive
opponents with blows.

He won't be the most exciting fighter you've ever seen, but I'll be
he'll do a lot better than 22-24.  Maybe 20-10 with an invite.

Trump
dfcleary@ucdavis.edu

References

DM: Roll-Up: Scum?
gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris)
Tue, 20 Apr 1993 18:05:17 +0000