Re: 2 more rollups

From: leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu

Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1993 17:13:24 +0000

In article <1993Apr22.095647.3217@msus1.msus.edu>, steve@mhd.moorhead.msus.edu (MORGOTH) writes:
> In article <1993Apr22.142533.5495@news.tufts.edu>, gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris) writes:
>>In article <186231@pyramid.pyramid.com> khearn@pyrps5.eng.pyramid.com (Keith Hearn) writes:
>>>
>>>First off, there's the 10-13-6-16-8-8-9. Nice Wit, can easily be 21.
>>
>>	Me, I'd make him a 13-13-6-21-9-9-13 Slasher.  You couldn't get
>>more than a 14 WL, so put the points where it can help.  I'd go offensive
>
> This would be a waste of what could be a very good warrior.  The 9 will gives
> little chance for any long term sucess.  A 13 will is a lot better then the 9.
> Also that 13 str is not necessary.  11 will give you all the good weapons in
> the game.  If you want a SL go with 11-13-6-21-13-9-11 or 11-13-6-17-13-9-15
> but i'd go for that 21 wit.
>

I agree with the 13 WL, but those last two extra points can go elsewhere.

Why not just go 10-13-6-21-13-8-13? One point into STR and SP will not match
what the 13 DF will give.  If you wanted, raising STR to 11 on the first turn
for weapon selection (longsword) will lose nothing.  This is a classic PRP
or TP design.

> Or kill me.
>

Hey, Crip, Morgoth wants to be killed! :)

Mike Lee

> Morgoth
>

References

Re: 2 more rollups
steve@mhd.moorhead.msus.edu (MORGOTH)
Thu, 22 Apr 1993 15:56:47 +0000
2 more rollups
khearn@pyrps5.eng.pyramid.com (Keith Hearn)
Wed, 21 Apr 1993 22:14:42 +0000
Re: 2 more rollups
gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris)
Thu, 22 Apr 1993 14:25:33 +0000

Referenced By

Re: 2 more rollups
steve@mhd.moorhead.msus.edu (MORGOTH)
Thu, 22 Apr 1993 15:56:47 +0000
2 more rollups
khearn@pyrps5.eng.pyramid.com (Keith Hearn)
Wed, 21 Apr 1993 22:14:42 +0000
Re: 2 more rollups
gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris)
Thu, 22 Apr 1993 14:25:33 +0000