Re: DM: Versus Lungers

From: burgesmw@cnsvax.uwec.edu

Date: Fri, 28 May 1993 01:23:30 +0000

In article <1993May27.174353.7881@cnsvax.uwec.edu>, leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu writes:
> In article <gunzlerC7oDy9.Lww@netcom.com>, gunzler@netcom.com (Mitch Gunzler) writes:
>> Jim, that explanation implies you get one and only one offer to go to ADM.
>> 'Zat right?
>
> Correct.
>
>> As long as I'm asking questions:
>>
>> The Red Book suggests that Lungers generally have an edge over Bashers.
>> Well, what has an edge over Lungers?
>> Better yet, does anybody have a ten by ten table showing the basic
>> relationships that way?
>
> Dependent upon the designs (grin), here are my W/L percentages vs lungers
> over 5 years:
> TP  57-9   86.4%    Easy wins using any type of TP (scum, offensive, etc)
> PL  46-26  63.9     Tough matchups, but I'd say PL do run 60% overall vs LU
> BA  5-0    100.0    I only ran bashers using decisiveness
> ST  7-1    87.5     Matt Burgess ran tons of strikers, I'll get him to post

What!!  You mean you want me to dig my DM stuff out?!?  That is a major job
and would require a 'please'.  8)   I had a ten x ten table made up before I
left.  I'll try to find it.

Matt

> LU  19-11  63.3     Should be closer to 50%, must've been use of challenges
> WS  18-10  64.3     A tough matchup, WS usually in ASM+ parrying 1st minute
> PS  3-1    75.0     I never ran many PS, PR, SL(none!)
> PR  1-2    33.3     Generally, lungers prey on PS and PR
> AB  3-8    27.2     Nuff said on this one! :(
> SL  0-0    --.-
>
> I'll see what I can do about a ten x ten table....
>
> Mike Lee
>
>>    Thanks again,
>>    Mitch

References

DM: Skills vs. Stats
jas@rdii.com (Jim Smith)
Thu, 27 May 1993 05:52:01 +0000
Re: DM: Skills vs. Stats
gunzler@netcom.com (Mitch Gunzler)
Thu, 27 May 1993 07:54:08 +0000
Re: DM: Versus Lungers
leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu
Thu, 27 May 1993 23:43:53 +0000