Re: DM: Versus Lungers

From: leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu

Date: Thu, 27 May 1993 23:43:53 +0000

In article <gunzlerC7oDy9.Lww@netcom.com>, gunzler@netcom.com (Mitch Gunzler) writes:
> Jim, that explanation implies you get one and only one offer to go to ADM.
> 'Zat right?

Correct.

> As long as I'm asking questions:
>
> The Red Book suggests that Lungers generally have an edge over Bashers.
> Well, what has an edge over Lungers?
> Better yet, does anybody have a ten by ten table showing the basic
> relationships that way?

Dependent upon the designs (grin), here are my W/L percentages vs lungers
over 5 years:
TP  57-9   86.4%    Easy wins using any type of TP (scum, offensive, etc)
PL  46-26  63.9     Tough matchups, but I'd say PL do run 60% overall vs LU
BA  5-0    100.0    I only ran bashers using decisiveness
ST  7-1    87.5     Matt Burgess ran tons of strikers, I'll get him to post
LU  19-11  63.3     Should be closer to 50%, must've been use of challenges
WS  18-10  64.3     A tough matchup, WS usually in ASM+ parrying 1st minute
PS  3-1    75.0     I never ran many PS, PR, SL(none!)
PR  1-2    33.3     Generally, lungers prey on PS and PR
AB  3-8    27.2     Nuff said on this one! :(
SL  0-0    --.-

I'll see what I can do about a ten x ten table....

Mike Lee

>    Thanks again,
>    Mitch

References

DM: Skills vs. Stats
jas@rdii.com (Jim Smith)
Thu, 27 May 1993 05:52:01 +0000
Re: DM: Skills vs. Stats
gunzler@netcom.com (Mitch Gunzler)
Thu, 27 May 1993 07:54:08 +0000

Referenced By

DM: Skills vs. Stats
jas@rdii.com (Jim Smith)
Thu, 27 May 1993 05:52:01 +0000
Re: DM: Skills vs. Stats
gunzler@netcom.com (Mitch Gunzler)
Thu, 27 May 1993 07:54:08 +0000