Re: Hmmm From: burgesmw@cnsvax.uwec.edu Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1993 01:19:18 +0000 In article <50598@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>, esuh@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Edward Suh) writes: > This article is just here to let you all know that I > wish to participate in this newsgroup. > I've been keeping up with the debate over DM and AG > and must say, am interested to know more about AG. > I've been playing DM for nearly 2 1/2 years now, but wish that it > had a magic system or group combat. I'd really like to see the > latter, but adventuring sounds like an interesting twist that i > would like to try. I just ordered the rulebook and setup for AG and > would appreciate any words of wisdom regarding initial chaaracter > design, etc... From my experience in Duelmasters, i realize the > futility of assuming that you know how to play a game by reading the > rules. The AG rules cover much of what you need to know. Unlike DM, you get hints as to what you will get by making a certain race, making him tall or short, etc. In AG, height is not a disadvantage to your character (and doesn't take points away from your stats). Once you get the rules, post or mail me any questions. I would be glad to help. >Everything i learned in DM came from my discussions with > managers who had been around for quite a bit longer than I. In any > case, I'd like to ask specifically Mike Lee(didn't you run the > warriors of Lee? or something...) if AG combat is comparable to DM > combat. i.e. are the strategy concepts similar? Training stats > detrimental to long-term potential? high intelligence and will key > to warriors abilities? and all that stuff. I believe Mike already answered these questions, so I will skip them. > Well, anyways, In terms of Duelmasters, I consider myself > fairly knowledgeable so any questions you have, i will try my best > to answer. Solunds like there are a few people on this Newsgroup > who have the same knowledge as I do, so I probably won;t need to say > much. For those of you curious, My manager name is JAVAMAN and I > currently run in 69 and 104. I used to run in > 3,4,5,7,10,18,21,24,28,37,44,45,58,and 59. My most established team > is in 7, but all my guys are dead, so i don't run there anymore. > Well, anyways, hope to hear from you all soon. > E. What team did you run in 37? Matt References Hmmmesuh@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Edward Suh)Mon, 07 Jun 1993 00:44:02 +0000 Up