Re: Hmmm

From: burgesmw@cnsvax.uwec.edu

Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1993 01:19:18 +0000

In article <50598@sdcc12.ucsd.edu>, esuh@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Edward Suh) writes:
> This article is just here to let you all know that I
> wish to participate in this newsgroup.
> 	I've been keeping up with the debate over DM and AG
> and must say, am interested to know more about AG.
> I've been playing DM for nearly 2 1/2 years now, but wish that it
> had a magic system or group combat.  I'd really like to see the
> latter, but adventuring sounds like an interesting twist that i
> would like to try.  I just ordered the rulebook and setup for AG and
> would appreciate any words of wisdom regarding initial chaaracter
> design, etc...  From my experience in Duelmasters, i realize the
> futility of assuming that you know how to play a game by reading the
> rules.

The AG rules cover much of what you need to know.  Unlike DM, you get hints
as to what you will get by making a certain race, making him tall or short,
etc.  In AG, height is not a disadvantage to your character (and doesn't take
points away from your stats).  Once you get the rules, post or mail me any
questions.  I would be glad to help.

>Everything i learned in DM came from my discussions with
> managers who had been around for quite a bit longer than I.  In any
> case, I'd like to ask specifically Mike Lee(didn't you run the
> warriors of Lee? or something...) if AG combat is comparable to DM
> combat. i.e. are the strategy concepts similar?  Training stats
> detrimental to long-term potential? high intelligence and will key
> to warriors abilities? and all that stuff.

I believe Mike already answered these questions, so I will skip them.

> 	Well, anyways, In terms of Duelmasters, I consider myself
> fairly knowledgeable so any questions you have, i will try my best
> to answer.  Solunds like there are a few people on this Newsgroup
> who have the same knowledge as I do, so I probably won;t need to say
> much.  For those of you curious, My manager name is JAVAMAN and I
> currently run in 69 and 104.  I used to run in
> 3,4,5,7,10,18,21,24,28,37,44,45,58,and 59.  My most established team
> is in 7, but all my guys are dead, so i don't run there anymore.
> Well, anyways, hope to hear from you all soon.
>                        E.

What team did you run in 37?

Matt

References

Hmmm
esuh@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Edward Suh)
Mon, 07 Jun 1993 00:44:02 +0000