Re: DM: Alliance War

From: gunzler@netcom.com (Mitch Gunzler)

Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1993 15:45:07 +0000

In article <CBusz4.67H@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> cjwein@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca (Chris J. Wein) writes:
>
>The nice thing about dixie lu's is that the lunger base ratings compensate
>for the lack of skills a 7 wit character gets plus there is a much
>better chance that a LU would be suited to very high, very high (or
>high, high etc.) than a striker or slasher who would probably get
>something like High, low etc.

Can anybody post what the typical "suited to" numbers would be for the
different styles?  Is this known to vary based on stats?
Is it known what difference running at "suited to" makes?
   (anddoes that depend on style/stats?)

For instance, I have a PL who seems to like 3-5-3 and 3-5-5, making
considerably more than 3 attacksagainst slow/tired targets without
losing defense skills as near as I can tell.  Is this unusual?

Mitch
>
>--
> Chris Wein                 |
> cjwein@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca |"Making something difficult is no substitute for
> (519) 888-4548             |making it impossible."
> U. Of Waterloo             |

References

Re: DM: Alliance War
cjwein@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca (Chris J. Wein)
Sun, 15 Aug 1993 03:53:55 +0000
Re: DM: Alliance War
jas@rdii.com (Jim Smith)
Mon, 16 Aug 1993 05:04:42 +0000
Re: DM: Alliance War
cjwein@watcgl.uwaterloo.ca (Chris J. Wein)
Mon, 16 Aug 1993 13:18:39 +0000