Re: DM and AG

From: bweinstein@pomona.claremont.edu

Date: Tue, 01 Feb 1994 05:53:07 +0000

>I run primarily in Barstow but will send one of my characters over to Ciston
>this coming turn.  I agree, the fight description for AG has no blurbs for
>things like critical attacks or critical dodges and is a little dry.  The main
>reason why I dropped DM for AG was that there are no limits on learning for
>your characters and you're always learning something every turn.
>
>Mike Lee
>Golden, Lobo, etc, etc

Well the other thing I didn't like about AG was that you the main creative part
was designing your warrior and then you kinda let them run.  There isn't too
much you can do to change the way your warrior runs.  In Duelmasters changing
the offensive effort of activity level makes a huge difference in how the fight
turns out.  In AG you set the range you wanna stay at and which then just att.
I would say the only advantage of AG is the adventuring, but I didn't find that
it was that interesting either.

PS my friends are the Church in Ciston (mention Tesuo: The Iron Man to get a
good response outta them) :)

SNOTMAN

References

Re: DM use weap 2-handed
leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu
Mon, 31 Jan 1994 09:38:49 +0000
Re: DM use weap 2-handed
bweinstein@pomona.claremont.edu
Mon, 31 Jan 1994 21:46:08 +0000
Re: DM and AG
leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu
Tue, 01 Feb 1994 01:14:52 +0000

Referenced By

Re: DM use weap 2-handed
leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu
Mon, 31 Jan 1994 09:38:49 +0000
Re: DM use weap 2-handed
bweinstein@pomona.claremont.edu
Mon, 31 Jan 1994 21:46:08 +0000
Re: DM and AG
leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu
Tue, 01 Feb 1994 01:14:52 +0000