Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision

From: Gary Baines <g.baines@dial.pipex.com>

Date: Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

Greg Lindahl wrote:
>
> kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks) writes:
>
> > BTW, no need to trot out your "precedents". This isn't a court of law,
> > precedents have no authority here. If we all followed precedents then
> > blacks would still be segregated and there'd be no women in the military.
>
> You forgot to call me Hitler. There's a precedent for bad Usenet
> arguments, and you're following it pretty closely.
>
> -- g

Ken, It's starting to look like you cann't win this one.  Despite the people on
this group having voted for the FAQ change -- g obviously won't make the change.
Why?  I couldn't tell you.  Perhaps he doesn't believe in democracy, or perhaps
it's another case of selective amnesia like his reply to your last post where
anything that pins him down he just ignores.  Against such a strategy what can one
do?  It might keep him in control of the FAQ, but the readers of this newgroup
aren't blind to his sidestepping.

I will make a plea now.  This FAQ change has a chance to remove this controvesy
from the newsgroup, so Greg, in the name of reason and whatever you hold as holy,
please make the change.  The group has spoken, now stand up and accept the result.

Gary.

References

Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000
Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000
Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)
Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000