Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision

From: kmgraphiks@aol.com (KMGraphiks)

Date: Tue, 08 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

>So I get accused of sniping if I do discuss it, and then the one time
>that I say "I quit", I suddenly have shown a desire to bury the issue
>EVERY TIME it has come up in the past few years.
>
>Oh, but I forgot, I had quit this public flamewar. But if you email me
>in private, I can outline the precedents which do exist for this
>situation, the precedents which you haven't followed. Then again,
>when last seen you were calling me a liar for not agreeing with your
>opinion, so I have serious doubts about your desire to be constructive.

You quit? No wonder you don't reply to posts that really pin you down
about your "threat" and dare you to carry it out.

BTW, no need to trot out your "precedents". This isn't a court of law,
precedents have no authority here. If we all followed precedents then
blacks would still be segregated and there'd be no women in the military.
This is a free country and a relatively free newsgroup. Here's a
thought...would you consider resigning as "Maintainer of the FAQ" so
someone a little more in tune with the needs and desires of a newsgroup
that promotes PBM can try for awhile? You may disagree that you're out of
touch with the majority of newsgroup readers but the main question
remains...would you voluntarily let someone else maintain the FAQ?

Ken Mitchell
The PBM Report

References

Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Mon, 07 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: PROPOSAL: Vote on FAQ Revision
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Mon, 07 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0000