Re: Imaginations Wanted/DayONE

From: "Mandala" <mandala@water.freeserve.co.uk>

Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Greg,

Let's get one thing straight, mate - I'm not always going to agree with what
you say but this time you're close to being correct. I think that a few boys
and girls running a free rpg game has EVERY right to withdraw a reviewing
position and not seem unreasonable.
Hell - If its free then the GMs should do what the fug they like - They
bought the gear, bought the paper, bought the stamps, bought the electricity
and sat the keyboards - They can do what the hell they like as long as they
send me a turn every now and then.

=============================================
Mandala
to email, change the water to vineleaf

Greg Lindahl <lindahl@pbm.com> wrote in message
news:7o1mr0$2rok@news1.newsguy.com...
> Carol Mulholland <Carol@flagship-uk.demon.co.uk> writes:
>
> > I think it's a mistake not to run a review position as originally
offered -
> > because it seems unfair to your game - but heck it'd be a sorry world if
we
> > had to expect GMs to be reasonable.
>
> You think that calling a GM unreasonable in public for declining to
> give you a free review position is reasonable? How about doing your
> dirty laundry in private?
>
> -- g
>

References

Re: Imaginations Wanted/DayONE
Carol Mulholland <Carol@flagship-uk.demon.co.uk>
Sun, 01 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Imaginations Wanted/DayONE
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Sun, 01 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: Imaginations Wanted/DayONE
Carol Mulholland <Carol@flagship-uk.demon.co.uk>
Sun, 01 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Imaginations Wanted/DayONE
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Sun, 01 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0000