Re: PBM deposits & value for money

From: mlwilliams <mwilliams@signal.dera.gov.uk>

Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Greg Lindahl wrote:
>
> "Kerry Harrison" <kerry@madhouseusa.com> writes:
>
> > I never said my poll showed anything as I never ran a poll specific to that
> > question, cuz frankly free games just don't enter my thoughts that often.  I
> > think we got a bit of miscommunication going on here.  I said that I figured
> > there was less than 10% overlap based on various sets of demographic data
> > for various PBM companies, I never said that I ran a poll on it nor meant to
> > imply that I did, sorry if my first post in this thread led you to think
> > that.
>
> Ah, I thought you had something to back your 10% number up. That's why
> I was giving you a counter-example.
>
> -- g

Kerry has 'various sets of demographic data from various PBM companies'
to back up the 10% figure.... To offer up a counter-example when
somebody is talking statistics shows a lack of understanding.

Smoking is bad for you - smokers die ten years earlier than non-smokers.

..yeah, but my grandad smokes and he's 106. *greg lights up*

Mark

--
Saturnalia
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Station/5676/sat.html

I'm sorry, I can't argue unless you've paid.

References

Re: PBM deposits & value for money
"Kerry Harrison" <kerry@madhouseusa.com>
Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: PBM deposits & value for money
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: PBM deposits & value for money
"Kerry Harrison" <kerry@madhouseusa.com>
Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: PBM deposits & value for money
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Tue, 07 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000