Re: The Death of PBM

From: spamfree@metropolis.net.au (Henry Penninkilampi)

Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000

In article <37D98AD5.327536F2@suilven.demon.co.uk>, ColinForbes
<timewyrm@suilven.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Steve T. wrote ...
> > The hobby is changing indeed and in some very good
> > ways, but not in the ways suggested by the doomsayers of this list.
> > Im not going to give my own view of it, because it'll just start the
> > flames all over again, and while they have been quite amusing,
> > you can get tired of hearing people who aren't and have never been
> > commercial GMs telling you all about how the commercial hobby is going.
>
> I agree! This is the thing that has struck me the most since regularly
> taking part in this list. You're probably right about starting the
> flames again, but I'd be very interested to hear your views if you want
> to have a private discussion. I suspect we may have a similar view
> (despite the odd disagreement we've hadd from time to time :-))

Fellas,

I'm sure I'm not the only one here who isn't a commercial gm and who *is*
interested in hearing what you have to say.  Please don't confine your
discussion about the *good* changes to PBM behind closed doors - let us
all hear it!  We need a bit of good news - even if it combusts.

Henry.

References

Re: The Death of PBM
ColinForbes <timewyrm@suilven.demon.co.uk>
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: The Death of PBM
madcentral@aol.com (MadCentral)
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: The Death of PBM
ColinForbes <timewyrm@suilven.demon.co.uk>
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0000