Re: Polaris Day 95 News

From: "Rob Harper" <stateofmind@breathemail.net>

Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Greg Lindahl wrote...
> "Kerry Harrison" <kerry@madhousepress.com> writes:
>
> > Not really.  Why would it be bad?  I'd love to see this newsgroup with
10x
> > or even 100x the level of traffic it currently has.
>
> I'd also love to see the newsgroup with 10 times *better* traffic.
> More volume about 1 game doesn't interest me, even if I played it.
>
> > >hopefully remember, I am on record as being unhappy with weekly
> > >postings from commercial games.
> >
> > And your point being?
>
> I was giving my opinion on a point raised by others. That's my point.
> Even if you disagree, it should be easy to see why I said it.

I must admit I agree with Greg on this matter.  I know this
newsgroup is pretty light on traffic, but I don't want to see
this "improved" simply by having people posting their game
newsletters all the time.

I take Steve T's point that newsletters can be an attraction
to interested parties and that they would make the whole NG
appear more vibrant (whoever it was that said that), but I'd
much rather see announcements and links, alongside occasional
examples.

Perhaps Kerry would attract more interest to Polaris if he
simply posted a newsletter or two alongside a short review and
a link to follow for more information...?

--
Luv&hugs, Rob.
State of Mind Games (Games by Post and Fish Out Of Water)
http://www.homestead.com/stateofmind

References

Re: Polaris Day 95 News
"Kerry Harrison" <kerry@madhousepress.com>
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Polaris Day 95 News
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: Polaris Day 95 News
"Kerry Harrison" <kerry@madhousepress.com>
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Polaris Day 95 News
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0000