Re: 666 and the wanker parade

From: silver+news@phoenyx.net (Karen J. Cravens)

Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0000

paul@black-sun.demon.co.uk (Paul Walker) wrote in
<slrn8darhi.cm4.arafel@nova.blacksun.org.uk>:

>On Thu, 16 Mar 2000 03:00:20 GMT, Karen J. Cravens wrote:
>
>>Cheez.  I had to go and look in the news spool to figure out what the
>>heck you guys were talking about.  (And when I did, I wasn't impressed.
>> I wish you'd kept it under the same topic, which my spamfilter nicely
>>squelched (on account of its "over 18" mention.))
>
>Heh. Go and find a newsreader that doesn't rely on subjects for
>threading. ;-) slrn is good, although the Win/DOS version is text-mode,
>which puts some people off.

XNews has the choice of relying on subjects versus references; I keep it
set to subject since if someone's gone to the trouble to change the
subject, it should mean that the thread has mutated enough that it should
be re-evaluated as to whether it should be nuked or not.  In this case, all
it means is "wanker" should go in my spamword list...

--
Karen Cravens (silver@phoenyx.net)
Phoenyx Play-by-Email Roleplaying - http://www.phoenyx.net/
Phoenyx PBeM Banner Exchange - http://www.phoenyx.net/bp/

References

Re: 666 and the wanker parade
silver+news@phoenyx.net (Karen J. Cravens)
Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0000
666 and the wanker parade
lindahl@rt.com (Greg Lindahl)
Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0000