Re: The GM: Is help a budding GM

From: mmmark@my-deja.com

Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000

In article <8cam7q12pm0@news2.newsguy.com>,
lindahl@rt.com (Greg Lindahl) wrote:
> mmmark@my-deja.com writes:
>
> > Well it explains at lot... I can see where all that venom and hatred
> > comes from now. Don't think of it as failing Gregory.
>
> But I don't have all that venom and hatred -- you made it up.

I know we could find a lot of people reading this thread who'd disagree
with you there Gregory.

>
> > Please offer some lame defence about how you could have had a phd if
you
> > wanted to - it'll convince everyone so much more. *big sloppy kiss*
>
> But I don't want one.
>
> And the discussion wasn't about me; it was about you claiming false
> authority based on your PhD in statistics, and claiming how other
> people must not understand what it takes to get a PhD. When we do. But
> that's OK, if you want to turn the thread into insulting other people,
> feel free: no one can stop you.

What was false about claiming that a Phd in stats enables me to know how
to use the words 'statistically speaking'?

I didn't claim that 'others' did not understand what it takes to get a
phd I said that you clearly didn't if you thought not knowing about the
details of the american defence set-up meant I didn't learn much on my
phd. This simple fact won't go away Gregory no matter how comical you
are in your efforts to ignore it.  :)

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

References

Re: The GM: Is help a budding GM
mmmark@my-deja.com
Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000
Re: The GM: Is help a budding GM
lindahl@rt.com (Greg Lindahl)
Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000

Referenced By

Re: The GM: Is help a budding GM
mmmark@my-deja.com
Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000
Re: The GM: Is help a budding GM
lindahl@rt.com (Greg Lindahl)
Mon, 03 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000