Re: Should I Play Olympia?

From: phen376022@aol.com (PHen376022)

Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0000

>Of course, one of the problems with an open-ended game is that players
>who start later in the game are at a big disadvantage.  The older
>players are so powerful, or everything has already been explored, or
>resources (mining, trade routes, etc.) have all been taken.  This
>brings me to my question.
>
>Should a new player (like me) start playing in Olympia?  Or would I be
>better off finding a newer game to join?  I'd really welcome any
>help/advice.
>
Short answer: If you are willing to join, or just cooperate with, an
established alliance, Absolutely! This can eliminate most of the disadvantages
of starting late.

If you are a strict loner, a few things will work against you. All surface
lands have been claimed by the various alliances. (though some borders are
still under dispute)
Most loners establishing land claims are taught the error of their ways very
quickly.

Oly II doesn't have the resource problem you mention above. The resources are
abundant and renewing, as are trade routes, though you may have to check with
the controlling alliance before harvesting. Most are very willing to allow
such.

Check out the Oly II website:
www.pbm.com/oly

You'll want to look at the mailing lists, and Oly Times to determine where you
might want to start.

Generally, there is war to the south and east, peace reigns in the west and
north.

If you'd like to know more, feel free to e-mail me directly.

L8r,

Pat

References

Should I Play Olympia?
ColdFire <coldfire@alt.net>
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0000