Re: Play by Web Sites -- Could they be better?

From: "Roy Pollard" <plod@proweb.co.uk>

Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000

mwilliams <mwilliams@signal.dera.gov.uk> wrote in message
news:38ECA6DF.263E716B@signal.dera.gov.uk...
> > As an aside, I haven't yet visited a PBM/PBeM website which I didn't
think
>
> > was cool in at least one aspect. Just DOING PBM on the web shows me that
> > these people have a genuine value to players.
>
> Are you sure you're in the right ng?

This is the shaven-armpits fetish NG isn't it?

>You're supposed to slate people for the
> quality of their html and lay into them for not putting on tabs for blind
> people or whatever... please consult the FAQ-you.
>
And FAQ-you too.

> Assuming this wasn't all one big typo: Gwarsh, thanks Roy. I think my site
> is cool because of the trailing logo - it probably buggers up most
vistors'
> display but on a decent machine it's great fun! In fact 7,000 of the hits
on
> the site are just me going there to wiggle that thing around some more :)
>
Wiggling that 'thing' will eventually make you go blind, you know.

Hmm, I seriously need to find something to do today.

References

Play by Web Sites -- Could they be better?
"Kristopher Andersen" <optimus@2d10.com>
Wed, 05 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Play by Web Sites -- Could they be better?
cj_williams@my-deja.com
Thu, 06 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Play by Web Sites -- Could they be better?
mwilliams <mwilliams@signal.dera.gov.uk>
Thu, 06 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000