Re: FLAGSHIP #88 - AD

From: "Rob Harper" <rob@stateofmindgames.co.uk>

Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:37:55 +0000

Steve T wrote (in reply to Greg L)...
> I wasnt criticising anything anybody said, or at leats not deliberately.
If It
> came across that way then I apologise, for that was not my intention.
Rob, who
> I was chatting with, didn't seem to be offended, but obviously I have not
been
> clear enough.

I didn't see anything to be offended by.  But I don't usually get
offended by people just relating their experiences and opinions.

<snip>
> >>Wow! Now that's discussion.<<
>
> Ah!  Agreeing with you is discussion.  I see your point.

I assumed Greg had his tongue in his cheek.  At least I hoped he had.

<snip>
> I think that you've entirely missed the point.  Perhaps deliberately
because
> you're such an argumentative ass, or perhaps because I wasn't clear
enough.
> Still, I was responding to Rob's message, and he seemed to understand what
iw
> as saying just fine.

I think I did, but come on, Steve, you know you and Greg wind each
other up so let's just leave it at that, eh?  (Although I note that
you were trying to be diplomatic in your last post.)

Oh, and Greg: Steve and I have known each other for years, we agree
on some things and disagree on others, but generally respect each
other.  If you lay off the sniping, you'll see that Steve has some
interesting points to make, and we'll all be able to see your views
more easily too.

Rob.

--
1 for sorrow, 2 for joy, 3 for a game and 4 for a toy.

References

Re: FLAGSHIP #88 - AD
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:05:12 +0000
Re: FLAGSHIP #88 - AD
madcentral@aol.com (MadCentral)
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:09:32 +0000

Referenced By

Re: FLAGSHIP #88 - AD
lindahl@pbm.com (Greg Lindahl)
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:05:12 +0000
Re: FLAGSHIP #88 - AD
madcentral@aol.com (MadCentral)
Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:09:32 +0000