Re: Gregs Auto Thingy

From: Carol Mulholland <Carol@flagship-uk.demon.co.uk>

Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:16:19 +0000

MadCentral wrote:

> Everybody seems to think they are okay besides me, so I'll shut up
about it.

I do have some doubts about the actual quality of the games, but heck
who am I to judge? (Maybe it's just that players are better at
describing a game than its GM/designer...)

> Id like to know how long a game has been running with a real quota
> of players (rather than just the GMs mates.)  That would be useful
> info, I think.

Yes, but difficult to formulate: a lot of the games sound as if they
only need a handful of players anyway, and possibly have GMs mates
as a permanent feature. Besides, new GMs with new games are (I think)
especially attractive to players - they wouldn't be put off by a
report that someone's just starting up.

Maybe we are getting into the question raised by someone a while
back, about how reliable these games are? (He complained that
every game he joined folded soon after.)

So let's see if we can get some discussion going: Are there any
questions that people here would ask a GM before joining? Is
there any way of estimating reliability?

Carol

References

Re: Gregs Auto Thingy
Carol Mulholland <Carol@flagship-uk.demon.co.uk>
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:25:47 +0000
Re: Gregs Auto Thingy
madcentral@aol.com (MadCentral)
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:16:52 +0000

Referenced By

Re: Gregs Auto Thingy
Carol Mulholland <Carol@flagship-uk.demon.co.uk>
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:25:47 +0000
Re: Gregs Auto Thingy
madcentral@aol.com (MadCentral)
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:16:52 +0000