Re: Duelmasters - Wiz's PL

From: kanga.caltech.edu!johnjohn (John White)

Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1992 22:24:34 +0000

In article <DAO.92Jan14125405@d62iggy.mitre.org> dao@d62iggy.mitre.org (David
A. Ondzes) writes:

>	I would like everyone opion on the following warrior
>	8-13-7-21-15-5-15 Parry-lunge
>	this warrior didn't get any intial experts, was I unlucky ? I do not
run
>many PL so I would appreciate some help on strategy.

I have a 17 wit/wil/deft PL that didn't have any starting experts.  He made Ex.
Attack in 2 skills, but has 2+ in all other areas without experts.  I would
expect about the same with yours (21/15/15 is about the same as 17's) I'm
actually _really_ unimpressed with the bonuses attached to Parry-Lunges.  I'm
leaning towards lungers with _all_ parry lunge designs.  I haven't really
decided this permanently, but my 11-13-5-16-18-8-13 Lunger made Challenger
Adepts by her 7th fight with four experts, while my 11-10-5-17-17-7-17 PL is
stuck in Challenger Inits with 8 fights and has his sole Expert in Attack.  He
learns 1-2 skills a turn.  I'm _really_ unimpressed.  Donald Trump liked him,
but so far, he fights and learns like crap.  Guess what, though.  I'm not
ditching a guy with 17 wit/wil/deft.  Ever.

Actually, thinking about it now, I could have built a powerful AB with those
exact stats.  DAMN DAMN DAMN.  Oh well, I'll just wait until my next rollup
like that comes along (DAMN).

--
John White
johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu

Craig:  So, John, meeting many women at Caltech?
John:   Women?  At Caltech? I think not!

--
John White
johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu

Craig:  So, John, meeting many women at Caltech?

References

Duelmasters : random stuff
dao@d62iggy.mitre.org (David A. Ondzes)
Tue, 14 Jan 1992 12:54:05 +0000