Re: DM - Would you DA?

From: padler@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Philip Adler)

Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1992 21:30:19 +0000

In article <12516@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> ccs012@underdog.ucdavis.edu (Riff-Raff) writes:
>In article <31957@sdcc12.ucsd.edu> padler@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Philip Adler) writes:
>I've also got a character who looks something like this, although mine
>is a PL.  "Bob" is a 9+-13-9-17-17-3-17 4-4-0 (started 0-4-0) dude
>with NEX Attack = 1 or 2.  I wouldn't _dream_ of DA'ing him.
sound's good to me!!

>But a SP 3 PR?  I mean, I wouldn't say that was the best stat to
>put a 3 in for a PR, would you (besides SZ, I mean).
My PR in question started with a 4 SP which I for no particular
reason trained to 5, but essentially the same sit. What you have is
a PR who's optimized for attack rather than riposte, but can still
parr and rip well enough to outdo most offensives. Sure the NEX
riposte is higher than usual for a PR (which goes to prove my point
about how screwed up the rip/def section of your chart is) but the
other ratings more than make up for it. (although looking at mine it
should have been a waste, but hey.)

>>I
>>wouldn't even retire someome like that in ADM, just too good to give
>>up.

>What if you only had 1 AD spot to run, and you had just graduated a
>SZ 3 WT 21 DF 21 Aimed Blow?

>Trump

What's the will on the AB? I'd take the 17 17 17 PR over a 21 9 21
AB and maybe a 13 will because in the long run you're better off. A
sz 3 AB whould be fun though. :)

Erias Talon...etc

PHil.

References

DM - Would you DA?
johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John White)
Wed, 22 Apr 1992 08:46:15 +0000
Re: DM - Would you DA?
padler@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Philip Adler)
Wed, 22 Apr 1992 20:32:11 +0000
Re: DM - Would you DA?
ccs012@underdog.ucdavis.edu (Riff-Raff)
Thu, 23 Apr 1992 06:07:30 +0000