Re: Olympia: no ifs, ands, or buts

From: eebonar@sn01.sncc.lsu.edu (DAVID BONAR)

Date: Fri, 01 May 1992 21:34:44 +0000

In article <1992May1.200455.25722@beaver.cs.washington.edu>, hauck@cs.washington.edu (Scott Hauck) writes...
>In article <1992May1.182620.8027@cbfsb.cb.att.com> skrenta@cbnewsg.att.com (Rich Skrenta) writes:
>>hauck@cs.washington.edu (Scott Hauck) writes:
>>> Also, both the wait and the if command should be able to test the amount of
>>> gold the player has (WAIT ITEM doesn't seem to do this).
>>
>>Eh?  Since when has "wait item gold n" not worked?
>>
>>It doesn't occur to many players to try this, maybe I should
>>just provide a redundant "wait gold" anyway.
>
>I think the problem is that this doesn't seem to be in the rules, and since
>gold is not treated like an item (ie. you "pay" someone gold, nbot "give" them
>it).  If you put this into the rules in the WAIT section, that would probably
>be sufficient, though a "WAIT GOLD" might be okay as well.

I've been using give (unit) 1 (amount) fairly often.  What doesn't
work about it?  I've ony used it within my faction but the rules shouldn't
care.

Dave
__________
Dave Bonar
eebonar@lsuvax.sncc.lsu.edu
__________

References

Olympia: no ifs, ands, or buts
hauck@cs.washington.edu (Scott Hauck)
Fri, 01 May 1992 08:02:12 +0000
Re: Olympia: no ifs, ands, or buts
skrenta@cbnewsg.att.com (Rich Skrenta)
Fri, 01 May 1992 18:26:20 +0000
Re: Olympia: no ifs, ands, or buts
hauck@cs.washington.edu (Scott Hauck)
Fri, 01 May 1992 20:04:55 +0000