Re: Duelmasters: Various Comments and Questions

From: johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John White)

Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:14:09 +0000

In article <1992Sep28.135902.5283@jade.tufts.edu> gharris@jade.tufts.edu
(George W. Harris) writes:
>In article <1a3p87INN3ir@gap.caltech.edu> johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John
White) writes:

>>Ok, but what size was Tula?  This is the stat that "implies" the most
about
>>a warrior.  Above size 12, and you're probably going to see warriors that
do
>>normal to good damage.  Was she well suited to SC?  With those two pieces
of
>>information, you can make an intelligent guess as to the damage
capabitlity
>>of your opponent...
>
>	Good point...Yikes, she's a midget--5'3".  She is, however, well-
>suited to her weapons.  Still, with a size like that, she's going to have
>to get lucky to hurt someone in chainmail.

Bzzzzzzt.  Wrong.  I have a size 5, strength 11 slasher that took out a APA
SCUM at the FtF in two minutes with a Scimitar.  Remember, slashers do a lot
of damage.

>Well, Tula was just 0-1, which could explain a lot.  Her loss comes
>against a warrior whose current record is 3-1, now a low challenger
initiate.
>So she's not exactly what I'd call a dangerous opponent...

Hey, hey.  Don't jump to conclusions, here.  The slasher that I mentioned
started out 0-1, (actually, he lost to Dennis's lunger, who ended up in the
low challenger inits, if I'm not mistaken).  Right now, he's:
11-7(1)-5-17-21-7-17; AdEx Attack, Init, Ex Defense, with FIVE fights.  You
never can be too sure about how dangerous an opponent is until you fight
him, and then, you still can't be that sure....

References

Re: Duelmasters: Various Comments and Questions
gharris@jade.tufts.edu (George W. Harris)
Mon, 28 Sep 1992 13:59:02 +0000