Re: Duelmasters: Various Comments and Questions

From: johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John White)

Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:13:57 +0000

In article <17598@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> itlm013@fella.ucdavis.edu writes:

>Occasionally a high WT roll-up will take longer to make into a good
>warrior.  One fight isn't really enough time to decide if a character is
>good or not.  I have a 9+-??-9-17-17-3-17 PL who started out 0-4, and has
>won his last 4 (before being retired).  Don't give up on a 17 WT so soon.
>
>Although 0 WT comments is almost never a good sign.  A TP?  Are you sure
>that wasn't an AB you were running? :)

I think the problem here is that George isn't telling us the other stats of
his TP.  That is what really determines whether a warrior is worthwhile or
not (though I must admit that I've never run a warrior who had 0 wit
comments).

9-9-13-4-12-15-8
>>
>>	I was thinking 10-9-13-5-17-17-13, make him an offensive type like
>>a striker, and train his ST up first fight.  Whaddaya think?
>
>I like him, although  I think that I would go with 12-9-13-5-17-17-11 ST
>and train ST to 13 the first fight so he can use the WH.  There isn't
>really much difference between DF 11 and DF 13, and the added weapon
>selection is more important than a couple extra skills.

I posted what I would like, but I do like this design better than the 13 df,
10 st one.  A dixie needs to do damage, and lots of it.

References

Re: Duelmasters: Various Comments and Questions
itlm013@fella.ucdavis.edu
Sun, 27 Sep 1992 07:40:34 +0000

Referenced By

Re: Duelmasters: Various Comments and Questions
itlm013@fella.ucdavis.edu
Sun, 27 Sep 1992 07:40:34 +0000