Re: DM: Another random character

From: 900667c@axe.acadiau.ca (GERALD RICHARD CAMERON)

Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1993 15:35:44 +0000

In article <ysLNXB1w165w@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca> crip@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Garth Werner) writes:

>        Well according to my formulas for determining endurance, this
>character will still have VERY LITTLE ENDURANCE.

I thought you didn't put much stock into any endurance formulas you'd seen?
John work out something new that the rest of us might like to see?

>        Now given that both of these start with VERY LITTLE endurance
>(Granted, A could get lucky and start with poor), will character A:
>really have any more endurance than B?  My initial opinion is no, however
>it's not really an intuition based on experience or my thoughts of how
>the game is run.  Rather this is a Crippian Hunch, and Crippian Hunches
>have tended to be semi-reliable in the past.  Still Any opinions are
>looked forward to.

I'd tend to say that there will be a difference in endurance, but just like
your opinion is based on a Crippian hunch, mine is "just" a Demonic
Hunch (TM).

References

Re: DM: Another random character
Theodore Wadsworth <tw1t+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Tue, 19 Jan 1993 02:32:43 +0000
Re: DM: Another random character
crip@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Garth Werner)
Tue, 19 Jan 1993 21:22:57 +0000

Referenced By

Re: DM: Another random character
Theodore Wadsworth <tw1t+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Tue, 19 Jan 1993 02:32:43 +0000
Re: DM: Another random character
crip@Micor.OCUnix.on.ca (Garth Werner)
Tue, 19 Jan 1993 21:22:57 +0000