Re: DM: Bonus rollup

From: johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John Carlos White)

Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1993 04:30:38 +0000

itlm013@george.ucdavis.edu (Captain Caveman) writes:

>In article <009669E0.139DD520@abby.chem.ucla.edu> ben@abby.chem.ucla.edu writes:
>>4-14-11-16-7-5-13

>Personally, I would go:

>	    PR
>ST  4 + 3 =  7
>CN 14 + 0 = 14
>SZ 11 + 0 = 11
>WT 16 + 5 = 21
>WL  7 + 2 =  9
>SP  5 + 0 =  5
>DF 13 + 4 = 17

Yuck!  I'll elaborate later...

>>Just to make it difficult, I don't particularly want to run another Sl, PS, or
>>Pl; and would have to be convinced to run a  ST.

>Actually, a PL wouldn't be very good with this roll-up: not enough speed.  I
>think they need 7-9.  PR's, however, can get by with a 3.

Basically, I only have one example of a warrior to talk about, and I know
that this one example isn't necessarally the typical one, but this is what
I have:
7(1)-10-14-17-17-3-17 PR;  she started with something like 5 skills from expert
riposte.  Yuck.  I think PR's need a 7-9 speed as well.

>>my best effort:
>>5-14-11-21-11-5-17 AB; This is likely what I'll send in by mon. mornin'.
>Why do you need all that WL with an AB?  Those points would be better
>spent in ST, expanding the weapon selection beyond DA and SH to include the
>EP and SS (I believe, it's been a while since I've played), and getting
>you within a reasonable distance of SC.

I would go further.  Why add at all to a 7 will just to get an 11?  Why not
go for the 9 st?  That gives you SC, SS, EP, etc.

Just a thought.

John

References

DM: Bonus rollup
ben@abby.chem.ucla.edu
Fri, 15 Jan 1993 03:02:42 +0000
Re: DM: Bonus rollup
itlm013@george.ucdavis.edu (Captain Caveman)
Mon, 18 Jan 1993 20:14:19 +0000

Referenced By

DM: Bonus rollup
ben@abby.chem.ucla.edu
Fri, 15 Jan 1993 03:02:42 +0000
Re: DM: Bonus rollup
itlm013@george.ucdavis.edu (Captain Caveman)
Mon, 18 Jan 1993 20:14:19 +0000