Re: DM - My first Roll-up in ages and a few comments

From: ewalents@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Erich Walentschak)

Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 06:53:47 +0000

In article <1jktfsINNlsv@darkstar.UCSC.EDU> rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charl
es Lebeau) writes:
>
>    Well after having my first warrior in a long while killed,
>(a Waste, 11(+2)-13-12-21-15-3-11 that started with Exp Attack,why
>does it always have to be the 21 wit warriors of mine that die?)
>I've got a new roll-up and here it is
>
>    9-8-13-11-9-10-10
>
>    Right now I'm leaning towards 9-8-13-17-15-11-11 Lu
>Simply because this would win me quite a few fights in the begining,
>and it's on a new team so it would help boost my record (I'm currently
>top unchartered and need to improve if I'm going to keep it).
>But I would be interested in hearing some other toughts, if anything
>really interests me, I can easily change my mind.

Actually, thats probably exactly what Id do.  Although it does depend on what
styles the arena favors.  If youre looking for a dixie, you may want to pump
the speed for decise or the deftness for the attack and not put so many into
will.  Thats only, of course, if you make that all-encompassing acceptance that
>this character will never make it to Primus.  I realize of course, Ill
probably get flamed big time for this, but it seems to many managers cant get
it out of their heads that they cant get every warrior to Primus.  Hell, I
havent gotten ANY warriors to Primus.  So, I try and work for today.

>    I also sent in my Striker to Darkholm, (the one who favors his fists
>and the Lunge tactic and the Responsiveness tactic).  It should be
>interesting to see his fight back, I set him up to run at his favorites
>Fists, moderate offensive, low activity, using both tactics in every minute.
>I am most likely going to change him back to a more standard Striker
>stragey next time, but it should be intersting to watch this fight,
>unfortunately I just realized I didn't give him any armor, out of habit,
>opps.
>
>    Also, I could use some advice on a slasher I have, his set up is,
>13(+1)-9-13-15-11-13-11  and started with an expert Init.  After 3 turns he
>is 0-3.  I lost to a P-R , a slasher, and a lunger.  I'm running 10-10-8
>RA-AM-D-N in the first minute (lost to the slasher and lunger in 1 minute,
>although I had the slasher desperate and then he riposte and took me out with
>one hit) 8-6-6 no tactics in the second minute (that's when I lost to the P-R
>although I was already losing at that point).  Any advice will be appreciated.
>
Here it just a matter of picking and choosong your fights.  I have to ask how
many fights did the people you fought have?  If the slasher had more fights,
yeah, he'll do that to you.  Thats why Ive fallen in love with Slashers lately.
 They seem to have a knack for that.  If you know youre going to fight a PR try
not to go decise.  Theyll chew you up if theyre any good.  Otherwise, it seems
like youve got good strategies.  Once again, its exactly how I run my slashers
1st minute.  Some might complain about the decise tactic, and it could be that
youre guy just doesnt like it.  I think the bonus to 1st strike is
vital,especially in early fights.  Once again, try and pick and choose who you
fight.  Challenges and avoids are what make a win/loss record.

>                   Thanks,
>                        Eclipse
>                        (formerly Airagon)
>
>Robert LeBeau
>rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu

PS What arena are you in?

Erich
The Wizard
Arenas 5,11,17,28,65,73,103

References

DM - My first Roll-up in ages and a few comments
rlebeau@cats.ucsc.edu (Robert Charles Lebeau)
Thu, 21 Jan 1993 01:15:40 +0000