Re: Ok, Mark, you opened the discussion

From: sjc@cs.purdue.edu (Steve Chapin)

Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1993 21:25:50 +0000

}} In article <1993Feb1.211120.24077@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> mnielsen@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Mark__Nielsen) writes:
}}
}} 	   Also, to steve, if a person specialized in weapon becomes dual
}} class, that human looses his specialization? Knowledge just gone up in
}} a puff of smoke? Specializations stay after the class has switched, but
}} no more can be re-learned.

Finally, a logical statement.  I agree, and I was waiting to see if
you would come up with a rational argument.  Of course he shouldn't
lose his specialization.  I retract my objection to the Count's
specialization, but I still say I could take him down with thirty men.

}} 	   It is sad that people take the fantasy out of games with rules
}} and regulations.

There has to be a balance.  All fantasy and no rules is how we played
"war" when I was a kid.  "I shot you."  "Did not, I dodged."  "Did
so."  "Nunh-huh."  Fine for six year olds, but not terribly
entertaining for adults.

sjc@cs.purdue.edu                 Steve Chapin                 ...!purdue!sjc
                     I advise that you take his advice.

"I'm Mephistopheles, Prince of Darkness!  When I start to harass you,
            you'll know it!" (Jon Lovitz, on Saturday Night Live)

References

Ok, Mark, you opened the discussion
kitten@scoraz.resp-sci.arizona.edu (Bruce Saul)
Mon, 01 Feb 1993 19:15:09 +0000
Re: Ok, Mark, you opened the discussion
mnielsen@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Mark__Nielsen)
Mon, 01 Feb 1993 21:11:20 +0000