Re: PBEM Supremacy?

From: derek@watertek.csir.co.za (Derek Hohls)

Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1993 06:41:10 +0000

In article <1vil38$k4t@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> at626@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Strout) writes:
>From: at626@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Strout)
>Subject: PBEM Supremacy?
>Date: 14 Jun 1993 19:55:19 GMT
>
>Was looking at the boardgame supremacy in the store this weekend and
>thinking that it would make a great PBEM game.  Sort of a Diplomacy on
>steroids.  (You won't negotiate with me??  Fine, negotiate with the Trident
>sub that just surfaced in the Med.)  Anyway, has anyone tried it / does a
>PBEM supremacy exist?
>
>dave.
>--
>Dave Strout          <at626@cleveland.freenet.edu>

Dave

I'm not sure about the PBEM part; if you have access to rec.games.board you
will see that a _lot_ of heat has been generated there over the past 2 weeks
or so about the merits/demerits of Supremacy as a playable game.  The
general opinion (my _own_ interpretation of the general opinion) is that the
game isn't playable without the MegaSupremacy handbook (which costs as much
as the game does...).  I suggest you cross-post to r.g.b & see what
response you get...

Derek
dhohls@watertek.csir.co.za
"Ain't no winter like a nuclear winter"

References

PBEM Supremacy?
at626@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Dave Strout)
Mon, 14 Jun 1993 19:55:19 +0000