Re: DM: Beginner's rollups

From: dresnick@athena.mit.edu (David I Resnick)

Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1993 23:01:40 +0000

In article <1993Jul06.130541.448@pencom.com> brian@pencom.com (Brian Hobbs) writes:

>(Request's advice on these rollups)

Most don't have long term potential (Defn: high WT/WL/DF) and should
be DA'd if you are into DAing (I am, some others are not).  However:

>   06-09-17-09-09-06-14

7-9-17-15-15-6-15 or 7-9-17-15-13-6-17
Style?  I dunno.  Howabout a lunger?  This guy may turn out to be good.

>   06-13-15-13-05-13-05

7-17-15-17-11-13-5 TP??????
UGH - Low WL and low DF!  High CN and SZ and SP!  DA him! My setup is pretty
random, since I see nothing good here.

>   13-10-18-07-04-08-10

19-10-18-9-5-8-15 BA

UGH2!  Howver this guy is more interesting than the last.  Might be
able to smash some skulls.

>   12-03-07-06-11-17-14

12-3-7-11-17-17-17 SL

WT is too low, but this guy could do well (what do you think, oh
Sultan of Slash?).  Nonetheless, he'll probably end up in the DA
through failure to learn skills.

>   14-06-15-09-10-05-11

15-6-15-15-15-5-13 BA or WS

Might be a decent guy.  I'd do him as a BA, but if you run the other
BA and don't want two he could be a good WS too.
--
       David Resnick                           dresnick@athena.mit.edu

References

DM: Beginner's rollups
brian@pencom.com (Brian Hobbs)
Tue, 06 Jul 1993 13:05:41 +0000

Referenced By

DM: Beginner's rollups
brian@pencom.com (Brian Hobbs)
Tue, 06 Jul 1993 13:05:41 +0000