Re: DM: Bloodgames and Killing

From: hitz@cuhhca.hhmi.columbia.edu (Ben Hitz)

Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 17:40:07 +0000

In article <gunzlerCA2x2y.MwJ@netcom.com> Mitch Gunzler,
gunzler@netcom.com writes:
>In article <1993Jul12.170941.14909@news.columbia.edu> Ben Hitz
><hitz@cuhhca.hhmi.columbia.edu> writes:
>>1st-- This is an announcement to those who read this group, but don't
>>still play DM.
>
>Er, why no those of us playing DM now?  It isn't as if RSI had mentioned
>this in our last turn results, or anything.

You should get an info sheet in your next turn, then.

>What's the difference between this and any other tourney?

In a normal tourney, you run your 'regular' warriors.  This is completely
contained.  After the 10 rounds, all surviving warriors are deleted.
Except the top 3, who are immediately promoted to ADM.  Oh, and that's
top 3 in _number of kills_  everything else is irrelevant.

>>Setup is 9 standard RSI-shit rollups, and one Frankenstein.  Pick the 5
>>you want.
>
>What's a Frankenstein ?!

A warrior where _you_ get to decide where all 84 points go.
i.e. 9-3-4-17-17-17-17 or 11-3-7-21-21-10-11 or whatever.
>
>And does this mean you get ten characters for ten weeks for $59?
>Is this because half of them die every turn, or what?
>
No, you get _5_ characters for 10 weeks, and half of them die every turn.
 Or something.  I've never been in one (a Blood game)...  You pick the
best 5 of 10 rollups, (including the one you design from scratch,
presumably)

Ben

References

DM: Bloodgames and Killing
Ben Hitz <hitz@cuhhca.hhmi.columbia.edu>
Mon, 12 Jul 1993 17:09:41 +0000

Referenced By

DM: Bloodgames and Killing
Ben Hitz <hitz@cuhhca.hhmi.columbia.edu>
Mon, 12 Jul 1993 17:09:41 +0000