Re: Well, I visited the Dark Arena this turn

From: hitz@cuhhca.hhmi.columbia.edu (Ben Hitz)

Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1993 15:15:16 +0000

In article <gunzlerCABo71.L8s@netcom.com> Mitch Gunzler,
gunzler@netcom.com writes:
>4-12-15-12-10-9-8

If you want at least a 7 ST (which is nice):
7-12-15-17-13-9-11  SL, LU or ST.  I would go SL  (for a ST, I would want
higher DF, for a LU, higher WL.) If you really want wins, a ST is
probably your best bet though.  SL (with 9 SP) can be tough.  For a ST,
make DF 13 and WL 11.   You could also go PS, but I can never run these
guys...

You could get slightly better skills by not raising the ST, but I
wouldn't bother.
>
>4-9-10-6-9-17-15
>
>	9-9-10-9-9-17-21 ST or LU?

No point in raising the WT to 9.  You might get a few wins out of this
guy, but he's not the best dixie (CN to hight, WL, ST, SZ too low).
Right to the dark arena.  (You winning % could hardly be _worse_,
concentrate on getting a decent team)
>
>6-12-14-13-9-13-3
>
>	8-12-14-13-13-13-11 WS?

Uhhh.   You added 8 to DF.  While that would be nice, you can't do dat.
This isn't a very good rollup.  maybe 11-12-14-17-10-13-7 BA.  That 12 CN
kinda ruins him.  I hate low WL, high CN!!  Almost as bad as high SP,
high CN!

You could also try 7-12-14-17-13-14-7 SL.  Might be OK.  Bashers suck.  I
would give this guy 3 fights.  If he loses big, and learns for shit (<1.5
skills/turn), DA him.

Ben

References

Well, I visited the Dark Arena this turn
gunzler@netcom.com (Mitch Gunzler)
Sat, 17 Jul 1993 18:47:24 +0000