Re: DM: another roll-up

From: Ben 'Critical' Hitz

Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1993 18:41:57 +0000

In article <1993Dec1.164014.16894@relay.acadiau.ca>
860099w@dragon.acadiau.ca (Marty Ward) writes:
>:What about this one...
>:
>:13-10-6-17-5-6-13
>:
13-10-6-21-11-6-17 AB  The 6 in WL could be a waste, (not a WS), so I
wouldn't argue if you put it in SP... I would if you put it in ST or CN.

You could also make this a ST (bleah) or PR.  Or PS, I suppose.  I would
not make an 11WL 6 SP SL (nor LU or BA), nor a 5 WL, 12 SP; (or anything
in between) but I have heard of such 'things'.  For a ST, maybe 8 WL, 9
SP? 7-10 split?  The possibilites are almost unlimitless...

I won't bore anyone with 'why ST suck'.  OK, I will a little.  In respose
in Garth (? or was it Crip?):  ST suck _because_ their bases suck.
Agreed, they don't suck in _every_ respect.

Just to give _both_ sides of the story:  This would make a pretty good ST
(for a ST), i.e. would give you lots of wins in basic, go to AD quick (20
fights?)  A maybe pick up a TV or even 2.

later.
Ben
--
"With humor Comrade, always with a bit of Humor"
         From 'The Manchurian Candidate'

References

DM: another roll-up
860099w@dragon.acadiau.ca (Marty Ward)
Wed, 01 Dec 1993 16:40:14 +0000

Referenced By

DM: another roll-up
860099w@dragon.acadiau.ca (Marty Ward)
Wed, 01 Dec 1993 16:40:14 +0000