Re: DM: Xochithlan-39 and a new roll-up

From: Ben 'Critical' Hitz

Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1993 00:13:02 +0000

In article <1993Nov30.225002.17771@relay.acadiau.ca>
860099w@dragon.acadiau.ca (Marty Ward) writes:
>:
>:Well, well, here I am again and I am pissed 'cause my turn results
>:SUCKED!
>:
>:But before I go into that, I just want to ask why no one else is
>:posting results from their arenas?  I'm the only one that does it
>:regularly.  Now, you may be running several teams, but you could still
>:post about your favorite team, or a team that did the best of the month.

Because we all fight in different arenas, and don't particularly care
about how you did... (and)

>:            9-15-9-13-9-6-9
>:
>:I thought of two designs: 9-15-9-17-15-6-15  WST or TP
>:                          11-15-9-17-15-6-13 WST or TP

Never would I add points to ST with this rollup!  9-15-9-17-15-6-15 looks
just fine to me...   I suppose the CN makes you think of defensives.  I
wouldn't restrict myself, _just_ because of the CN, this is a pretty good
one.  I would go TP over WS (WS, IMHO, need 17+ WL), Also would make a
decent PS, PR or AB even (shock! Even without a 21 DF).  Ehhh, maybe not
an AB.

Ben

--
"With humor Comrade, always with a bit of Humor"
         From 'The Manchurian Candidate'

References

DM: Xochithlan-39 and a new roll-up
860099w@dragon.acadiau.ca (Marty Ward)
Tue, 30 Nov 1993 22:50:02 +0000