Re: More Info On My Team (DM)

From: johnjohn@cco.caltech.edu (John Carlos White)

Date: Wed, 12 Jan 1994 00:01:52 +0000

leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu writes:

>In article <9401101811.tn11029@aol.com>, mysticbob@aol.com writes:
>> Here is specifics on my team's first round.
>>
>> DONUTMAN VS. EMBEZZLING SCRIBE
>> Donutman is11-14-14-11-11-10-13 striker.

>Donutman's design isn't the best for a striker.  I would probably Dark
>Arena him, but all the netters get on my case for settling for the "perfect
>design."

Nono.  I would DA too.

>> ANGUS VS. MORDANT DESERTER
>>
>> Angus is 19-15-15-9-8-9-9 wall of steel.

>A really bad rollup.  Without WL, most wall of steels aren't good.  If you
ng him, I'd recommend a lot less armor/weapo s.  You don't
y backups at the beginning of your career.  Perhaps:
I agree.  WS needs at least 15 will, preferable 17 or 21., WF/ME, backup SM.
nd 2nd min: 3-5

>> M'BARL THE UGLY VS. GALVIN
>> M'barl the Ugly is a 16-15-16-9-11-9-8 basher.

>Not the greatest design, but workable.  Far too much armor/weapons again.
>This type of basher is a low activity level basher (a "dixie" basher).  Other
>basher type would go 10-10-10-D and wear no armor.
>I'd go something like: ACM/H, mace, no backups, you have the right idea on
>strategy for this type of basher.  10-2-10-B to 10-4-10-B are fine.  You might
>consider APM as a basher's defense is non-existant.

The thing that I've noticed is that the bashing style seems to have
good decise, even when loaded down with armor/weapons.  Consider
going 10-10-7-Decise across the board with no armor, WH-WH.  Bashers
are very decisive.  Or tank up.

John
--
John White
johnjohn@unholy1.caltech.edu
Prelaw
Caltech Undergrad

References

More Info On My Team (DM)
mysticbob@aol.com
Mon, 10 Jan 1994 23:11:59 +0000
Re: More Info On My Team (DM)
leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu
Tue, 11 Jan 1994 04:32:49 +0000