Re: Legends pop seg knowledges

From: pmf@astro.cf.ac.uk (Phillip Fayers)

Date: Tue, 11 Jan 1994 10:27:51 +0000

In article 94Jan10112300@sherman.mit.edu, dresnick@athena.mit.edu (David I Resnick) writes:
>In article <CJF6D8.70A@inviso.com> robbiew@inviso.com (Robbie Westmoreland) writes:
>
>   Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!menudo.uh.edu!uuneo.NeoSoft.com!inviso.com!robbiew
>
>>   BTW, a clarification for NIC (from observation):
>>  a Magic (glimmered) normal weapon has DAM 1
>>   a Mithril or Meldorian weapon has DAM 1
>>   a Magic (glimmered) Mithril or Meldorian weapon has DAM 2
>>  a Mithril or Meldorian weapon with a Pwr rating had DAM (1+Pwr)
>
>>  The current listing in the NIC Item List that postulates a DAM 5 for Pwr 3
>>  weapons (and is caveated by a comment suggesting it may be high) is, in fact
>>  high.
>
>
>Not all true.  Pwr4 mithril swords and axes have Dam6, Pwr6 staff has
>Dam8.  All from my own NIC experience....
>
and the Pwr3 staff my guy is carrying gives DAM 5.  Should the proper calulation
be:
	a Mithril or Meldorian weapon with a Pwr rating, DAM = 2 + Pwr
otherwise a Pwr 1 mithril weapon would have the same DAM as a glimmer'ed one.

---
Phillip Fayers                           JANET    : P.Fayers@uk.ac.cf.astro
SunAdmin/Support/Programming (TM)        INTERNET : P.Fayers@astro.cf.ac.uk
University of Wales, College of Cardiff  phone    : 0222 874000 ext 5282
Department of Physics and Astronomy
P.O. Box 913, Cardiff, CF2 3QD.

References

Re: Legends pop seg knowledges
dresnick@athena.mit.edu (David I Resnick)
Mon, 10 Jan 1994 16:23:01 +0000