Re: DM: New Roll-up

From: Ben 'Critical' Hitz

Date: Sat, 19 Feb 1994 20:18:20 +0000

In article <2k5pmgINN8ut@uwm.edu> dray@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Daniel Ray Giese)
writes:
>:Just got it : 9-6-16-14-10-3-12.
>:WT->17 DF->17 WL->15 is what I was thinking,
>:but is that speed too low, and what would a
>:9-6-16-17-15-3-17 (+1) warrior be (seems too
>:low speed for offense and no con for defense)

Hey!  Don't complain!  Low CN, Low SP is fairly ideal.  It won't however,
go 10-0.  The extra point can be stuck on SP or ST. I think here they're
about equal.  You might get a damage bonus with the 10 ST, but 4 SP is
probably better than 3.  I would go SL or LU.  Hmm.  15 WL, 6 CN 9 ST--
This guy will have _no_ endurance.  I'd be surprised if a LU or SL lasted
past the 2nd minute.  I might go AB. It will probably die, though.  You
could also try ST or PS.  (run the PS or AB offensive)  The advantage of a
LU is that he might dodge well.  I suppose you could Try PR, or even TP!

To keep alive PS
otherwise AB.

Ben
--
"With humor Comrade, always with a bit of Humor"
         From 'The Manchurian Candidate'

References

DM: New Roll-up
dray@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Daniel Ray Giese)
Sat, 19 Feb 1994 19:35:44 +0000

Referenced By

DM: New Roll-up
dray@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Daniel Ray Giese)
Sat, 19 Feb 1994 19:35:44 +0000