Re: DM: Just got a new team

From: Ben 'Critical' Hitz

Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 00:01:52 +0000

In article <1994Feb16.100405.8592@msus1.msus.edu>  writes:
>:
>:9-5-7-13-12-6-18
>:
>:Nice start, I was thinking 11-5-7-17-17-6-21 PL, But with that low con
>:would she be better going with an offencive style?

I won't even bother to curse profanly.  PL would be nice, but a bit prone
to death.  LU or SL, just for the sheer decis.  A nutzo-WS.  I would go
LU, just for the ridiculous bases you would get (Easily attack, defense
and init.  Maybe adex attack).  SL can hit harder (SC/BS vs. LO), which is
a concern since your endurance won't be great.

>:16-4-15-11-8-10-6
>:
>:I told her 21-4-15-17-8-10-9 ST, The deft is a bit low, but one hit
>:should be all he'll (oups she'll) need.

I would go 17 ST 12 SP 11 DF.  You can train ST to 19-20 to get damage,
without 11 DF, you'll never hit anything.

>:4-16-13-8-12-9-8
>:
>:Looks like 7-21-13-9-17-9-8 TP, I know, I know, but she's a new manager
and
>:will like to win a lot.

No comment.

>:10-7-8-10-14-11-10
>:
>:I like 11-7-8-15-17-11-15 LU, Again she'll wana win a lot.

Sure, or SL.  PL even.  El Strango WS

>:14-8-4-18-9-7-10
>:
>:How about 14-8-4-21-15-7-15 SL, Win Win Win

Nice!  I would go SL as well.  LU also OK.  Interesting TP.  ST or PS
would probably go 20-0, but it's a shame to waste this rollup on one.

Ben
(Hmmm.  Maybe I should get married!)
--
"With humor Comrade, always with a bit of Humor"
         From 'The Manchurian Candidate'

References

DM: Just got a new team
gade@mhd1.moorhead.msus.edu (Epitaph)
Wed, 16 Feb 1994 15:04:05 +0000