Re: DM: Challenges? From: leeme@cnsvax.uwec.edu Date: Tue, 08 Mar 1994 06:26:36 +0000 In article <9403071419.tn309944@aol.com>, mysticbob@aol.com writes: > Ok, I think I am starting to get the hang of this thing (ya right). But I > still don't have the challenging thing down. What styles should challenge > what styles? My team: > > (#1) 1-0 LU (11-13-15-13-17-6-9) > (#2) 0-1 TP (16-21-15-9-5-9-9) > (#3) 1-2 WS (11-10-9-17-17-4-17) Ex. Attack > (#4) 2-1 PR (11-13-5-16-16-6-17) > (#5) 3-1 LU (11-5-9-15-17-10-17) Ex attacke Ad. Ex Init > > Do offensive styles want to go for defensive ones? And vice verca? A repost of my past win-loss style vs style table. Some style vs style matchups should jump out at you. Mr. Lee's Win/Loss table for Duelmasters (yeah, yeah, it's a little bit skewed from my non-acceptance of sub-par designs, but you should be able to glean some matchups that will favor a particular style) Vs BA SL ST LU PL PS WS AB PR TP BA 8-1 2-1 5-1 5-0 1-1 2-2 1-2 2-1 2-1 3-6 SL -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ST 4-4 7-7 5-4 7-1 4-0 1-3 3-4 5-0 4-2 5-3 LU 15-11 9-3 8-3 19-11 15-9 11-3 19-10 9-2 5-4 17-7 PL 14-7 10-4 19-1 46-26 19-8 32-12 35-18 17-2 34-12 38-13 PS 2-1 0-1 3-0 3-1 1-1 2-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-1 WS 4-5 2-1 10-6 18-10 6-2 11-2 9-17 1-2 3-0 9-7 AB 7-9 3-4 2-3 3-8 3-1 5-5 12-5 3-2 4-3 13-2 PR 0-2 1-2 1-0 1-2 1-0 0-2 1-0 0-1 0-0 1-1 TP 25-10 8-9 35-11 57-9 22-7 13-5 38-7 5-6 14-7 24-14 > And which, if any of these guys, should I run in the tourney? I would only run characters you plan on keeping for a long time. My opinion would be run characters #3, #4, and #5. Mike Lee > And am I hooked already? I'm thinking about getting another team. :) > -Shawn References DM: Challenges?mysticbob@aol.comMon, 07 Mar 1994 19:20:45 +0000 Up