Re: DM: possibilities.....

From: ez007195@dale.ucdavis.edu (Yeon Choi)

Date: Wed, 02 Mar 1994 06:16:25 +0000

In article <0097ACC8.F5A87462@pomona.claremont.edu> sshankle@pomona.claremont.edu writes:
>What would people have suggested for a 10-10-10-17-17-7-13 warrior.  I've been running her for 9 turns and 2 tourneys, but I'm beginning to doubt my original decision and wanted to see what other people would have done.
>
>Thanks,

10-10-10-17-17-7-13? Pretty good, but fairly generic.  In a good way,
don't get me wrong, just nothing extraordinary (like 17/21/17 WT/WL/DF).

I would have made this character a WS, trained ST to 11 after the 5ht
fight (used SC/ME up to that point) and then train skills until they
maxed out.

I suspect, from the tone of the post, that you made this character
either a piker (parry-strike) or plunger (parry-lunge).  Both of
those styles would have been fine, too.  It's just that they take a
little longer than most to get going and can thus be very
frustrating.  Don't even worry about a .500 record until the 15-20 fight
mark unless your character is very lucky.

They simply have a style disadvantage against nearly everyone.

Trump
ez007195@dale.ucdavis.edu

PS  Never second-guess yourself on a WT 17 WL 17 warrior.  You did
fine, really.

References

DM: possibilities.....
sshankle@pomona.claremont.edu
Wed, 02 Mar 1994 04:20:59 +0000