Re: ME-PBM; To the Shades of Madness Game 166

From: panamon@netcom.com (Ian Verhaegen)

Date: Tue, 27 Sep 1994 23:06:18 +0000

ZU02578@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu wrote:
: In article <35o8bt$ci@newsbf01.news.aol.com>
: tolkien@aol.com (Tolkien) writes:
:
: >
: >Nate and Croonies:
: >
: >Game 166 is looking very interesting!  The performance of the Shades has
: >gone as predicted, very poor military strategy and a desire to play
: >character nations while the Neutrals fight your battles.  To the neutrals
: >in game 166.  I have first hand experience while working with the Shades
: >as a neutral ally.  They will not let you place in the top three!  Ask any
: >neutral in game 72, it was the neutrals which fought every decisive
: >battle, while the shades built up their characters to eliminate the
: >Neutral nations at the games end.  But in 166 we see a different story.
: >It seems the Shades' reputation has proceeded them and now they have to
: >fight their own battles.  I'm glad to see these 166 Neutrals know what the
: >Shades are about.  The Shades are being pulled down.
: >
: >Mithnyano
:
: Mithnyano,
:
	I do not appreciate being called a 'croonie'.  Naurmegil has no
input into my decisions or those other team members near me.  We
coordinate when needed, but all players on this team are experienced in
their own right, by their own game experience in independent games.

Ian...#4.

References

ME-PBM; To the Shades of Madness Game 166
tolkien@aol.com (Tolkien)
Wed, 21 Sep 1994 03:13:01 +0000
Re: ME-PBM; To the Shades of Madness Game 166
ZU02578@uabdpo.dpo.uab.edu
Fri, 23 Sep 1994 19:03:56 +0000