Re: rec.games.pbm.quest

From: desj@ccr-p.ida.org (David desJardins)

Date: Sat, 03 Dec 1994 19:55:56 +0000

Chris Clarke <ctc@rowan.coventry.ac.uk> writes:
> As those of you who are on the mailing list (and if not, why?)

Is this supposed to be a serious question?  Obviously, because we don't
play Quest.

> will know, I am considering proposing the above group for the
> discussion of Quest and Crasimov's World.

I don't see how you can expect anyone not familiar with the mailing list
to have an opinion.

If you have an active mailing list, which has been running for many
months, perhaps a year, with a constant volume over that time of say
10-20 posts/day or more, and say 100-200 subscribers, then it might be
something to think about.

If you have much less than that, then it's not.  Even if you do, I
doubt you will pass a vote, because I suspect that most of the r.g.pbm
readers would prefer to have the discussion in this group.

Since other people have suggested that Quest players don't post here
because they would be "drowned out" by the tiny volume that this group
currently has, I find it hard to believe that there's sufficient volume
to justify a group at all.

David desJardins
--
Copyright 1994 David desJardins.  Unlimited permission is granted to quote
from this posting for non-commercial use as long as attribution is given.

References

rec.games.pbm.quest
ctc@rowan.coventry.ac.uk (Chris Clarke)
Thu, 01 Dec 1994 20:55:13 +0000