Re: Ultimate Goals in Olympia

From: srt@sun-dimas.aero.org (Scott Turner)

Date: Thu, 05 Jan 1995 22:24:52 +0000

whalen@stromboli.usc.edu (Tim Whalen) writes:
>The attack on Oleg was IMO unwarrented.  I know for a fact that he
>was an ex post facto participant only in the "Dogmatix affair" and so
>that is a weak excuse.  Your excuse of boredom is also pretty lame at
>this early phase in the game.

Perhaps I didn't make it clear enough in my original posting, but my
discussion of ultimate goals in Olympia was in no way intended to be
a justification for the attack on Oleg.  I'm not so bored with Oly
that I'm off attacking people at random.  But I can see that on the
horizon, and I thought maybe people would find it interesting to
discuss.

As far as the attack on Oleg goes, there's more than a sufficiency of
game reasons for it.  I didn't see Greg's posting as a complaint of
that sort (or as a complaint of any sort, for that matter).  Certainly
if Oleg had jumped Dr. Pain, I might have posted something that said
"see what a hypocritical mad dog Oleg is" but I wouldn't have
complained that the attack was unwarranted.

-- Scott T.

References

Re: Ultimate Goals in Olympia
whalen@stromboli.usc.edu (Tim Whalen)
Thu, 05 Jan 1995 03:14:32 +0000
Ultimate Goals in Olympia
srt@sun-dimas.aero.org (Scott Turner)
Thu, 05 Jan 1995 00:40:52 +0000