Re: Has anyone played "Suzerainty"?

From: jbrowning@hayes.com (Damage Control)

Date: Wed, 08 Feb 1995 10:42:36 +0000

In article <3h43tj$fqe@runner.ccr-p.ida.org>, desj@ccr-p.ida.org (David desJardins) writes:
> Damage Control <jbrowning@hayes.com> writes:
>> Primarily #2, but there are some things that are yet to be full documented.
>> I'll give an example of both :
>
> These both seem like examples of #1 to me: things that the documentation
> should tell you, but doesn't.  Anyway thanks for the honest answer; at
> least I know that this is a game I wouldn't want to play.
>
>                                         David desJardins
> --
> Copyright 1995 David desJardins.  Unlimited permission is granted to quote
> from this posting for non-commercial use as long as attribution is given.

Your decision, of course. However, Suzerainty is a fun, playable game, and
suffers less than most from the "undocumented" problems - and the GM is fixing
all of these. I'm happy with it, at least. I might point out that there is
no non-trivial game that I know of where a veteran player doesn't have some
kind of advantage over the novice.

JB
jbrowning@hayes.com

References

Has anyone played "Suzerainty"?
cr792@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Leo A. Tischer)
Sat, 14 Jan 1995 06:41:51 +0000
Re: Has anyone played "Suzerainty"?
jbrowning@hayes.com (Damage Control)
Thu, 19 Jan 1995 11:42:55 +0000
Re: Has anyone played "Suzerainty"?
desj@ccr-p.ida.org (David desJardins)
Thu, 26 Jan 1995 02:08:34 +0000
Re: Has anyone played "Suzerainty"?
jbrowning@hayes.com (Damage Control)
Mon, 30 Jan 1995 18:02:54 +0000
Re: Has anyone played "Suzerainty"?
desj@ccr-p.ida.org (David desJardins)
Mon, 06 Feb 1995 03:09:39 +0000