BSE-L Digest 47 From: kerry@freeside.fc.net (Kerry Harrison) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 15:59:43 +0000 Beyond the Stellar Empire Discussion List <BSE-L@consensus.com> BSE-L Digest 47 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Re: Luxury Liners by rboggs@isisph.com (Russ Boggs) 2) Capellan Stargate by "JASON GOFF" <JGOF4P1@S1.csc.peachnet.edu> 3) SSL Roadshow by "JASON GOFF" <JGOF4P1@S1.csc.peachnet.edu> 4) Re: My home by Pure Imagination <A127@ATUVM.ATU.EDU> 5) Re: My home by Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> 6) Re: Stargate trashing.... by regstu@sun.cc.westga.edu (Richard Gurley) 7) Re: Luxury Liners by HarryFlash@aol.com 8) CPT by Shannon Rundquist <75477.1627@compuserve.com> 9) Re: Werth Trials by StephMarte@aol.com 10) Re: CPT by chazz@cais.cais.com (Charles Meredith) 11) Quality Tension-Relief Products from USS by George Hammond <gstarrh@umich.edu> 12) CPT Deadline by Wayne Alexander <71470.344@compuserve.com> 13) Re: CPT Deadline by Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> 14) Re: Quality Tension-Relief Products from USS by Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> 15) Re: Stargate trashing.... by Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> 16) Re: Porkamo stargate by Shannon Rundquist <75477.1627@compuserve.com> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 09:28:04 -0800 From: rboggs@isisph.com (Russ Boggs) To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: Luxury Liners Message-ID: <v01510102ab84e9de0899@[192.65.129.70]> >Steve D., > >It's "von Ludendorf", not "Von Ludendorf". >You'll have to do better than that to annoy me. > >Steve M. >-------------------------------------- >As the famous actor once said: "You can say anything you want about me as >long as you spell my name right." I don't know, maybe he got to you (g). After all, you sign 99% of your messages as S.Mathews, but for this one you got confused and signed it Steve M. Pretty suspicious, I'd say (g). A shrink would have a field day with it. --Russ Boggs ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 13:33:56 EST From: "JASON GOFF" <JGOF4P1@S1.csc.peachnet.edu> To: bse-l@consensus.com Subject: Capellan Stargate Message-ID: <MAILQUEUE-101.950309133356.320@S1.csc.peachnet.edu> Admiral von Ludendorf, I had heard about the RIP a$%&^$es attack on SSL Capellan Stargate. I do plan to repair the stargate as soon as I can get a freighter up and running to carry materiels out there. I also plan retribution against the RIP, but that's a given. One RIP colony on Lorna in the Spandau system has already been turned into a smoking crater by SSL Ambrosia. Don Guido Jason Goff 11 Avalon way Riverdale, GA 30274 404-478-0945 JGOF4P1@S1.CSC.PEACHNET.EDU ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 13:45:07 EST From: "JASON GOFF" <JGOF4P1@S1.csc.peachnet.edu> To: bse-l@consensus.com Subject: SSL Roadshow Message-ID: <MAILQUEUE-101.950309134507.416@S1.csc.peachnet.edu> Admiral von Ludendorf, Your offer of an ITS supra hauler in exchange for a roadshow visit is gladly accepted. However, it may be some time before any roadshow can be put into service. I still have to build the modules, and my production que is full. I am also busy moving warships to gaurd the Capellan stargate. I will contact you (and everyone else out there) when I am ready to put a Roadshow in service. Don Guido Jason Goff 11 Avalon way Riverdale, GA 30274 404-478-0945 JGOF4P1@S1.CSC.PEACHNET.EDU ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 09 Mar 95 15:07:11 CST From: Pure Imagination <A127@ATUVM.ATU.EDU> To: <BSE-L@consensus.com> Subject: Re: My home Message-ID: <09MAR95.16329613.0058.MUSIC@ATUVM.ATU.EDU> what's the mailserver for this list? I wanna unsubsribe, and I lost it. ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 16:03:48 -0600 (CST) From: Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> To: Pure Imagination <A127@ATUVM.ATU.EDU> Cc: Beyond the Stellar Empire Discussion List <BSE-L@consensus.com> Subject: Re: My home Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9503091624.A17399-0100000@pentagon.io.com> On Thu, 9 Mar 1995, Pure Imagination wrote: > what's the mailserver for this list? I wanna unsubsribe, and I lost > it. > listproc@consensus.com ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 17:06:55 -0500 (EST) From: regstu@sun.cc.westga.edu (Richard Gurley) To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: Stargate trashing.... Message-ID: <9503092206.AA05465@sun.cc.westga.edu> Greetings to all, I am Ens. K'ahl vestai Rall, an IND captain currently working for the QSN. After studying every piece of information that I and my n***a connections could discover, the following theory is the ONLY one to fit the data. All Stargate attacks from the Capellan incident forward ( and possibly up to the first 3 before that), where performed at the instigation of the FGZ (cf) by other AFF's because the FGZ (cf) is afraid to take responsibility for said actions. The only rational reason possible for this situation is the fact that the FGZ (cf) is most likely planning to attack it's neighbors in the Transhole region once the only easy routes in and out have been either destroyed or captured. This theory is even stronger when you realize that the FGZ (cf) have been building a massive "defense" fleet, when they new that the only viable routes to attack FGZ (cf) space where being cut off at an alarming rate of speed. Well, all I can say is this to the WCE, "You asked for it." Even if this theorem is proved false, there is still the proven fact that the FGZ (cf) have just proven themselves to be quite expert in the combat form known as "let's you and them fight!!!" At this point in time, unless sanity prevails, the WCE and the QSN could easily become entangled in unnecessary combat, simply to prove that the FGZ (cf) can oh-so-easily manipulate your thoughts, leading everyone to believe that he is defenseless, when actually he is acting like a tiger, stalking his prey. Deep thoughts and Shadowy comments, Ens, K'ahl vestai Rall ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 19:05:38 -0500 From: HarryFlash@aol.com To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: Luxury Liners Message-ID: <950309190537_44647925@aol.com> Dear Russ, An excellent point! Guess that the pressure of oppressing the entire CP is finally getting to old PD von (note the small "v"!!!!!) Ludendorf. And unless I'm mistaken, he just gave me permission to say anything I want about him, as long as I spell his name right! But you know, aside from the fact that he is the jackbooted instrument of Imperial Terror, I really don't have much against von Ludendorf. On a personal level, he's probably a very nice man. Why, I understand he was the one who start that relief fund for Imperial officers who had been unmanned by malfunctioning robotic sheep. What a guy!!!! Regards, Harry ------------------------------ Date: 09 Mar 95 21:48:12 EST From: Shannon Rundquist <75477.1627@compuserve.com> To: BSE LIST <BSE-L@consensus.com> Subject: CPT Message-ID: <950310024812_75477.1627_GHJ77-3@CompuServe.COM> Wayne Alexander Excellent job on the CPT. Like it. Suggestion - where you list how to make submission, how about a permanent short ad telling people how to subscribe to the BSE List? Again, excellent work. Shannon ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 21:59:32 -0500 From: StephMarte@aol.com To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: Werth Trials Message-ID: <950309215930_44849226@aol.com> Dr. Zachary Smith, If you would be so kind as to let me know the outcome of the trial, I would be forever grateful. Arthur Curry ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:08:05 -0500 From: chazz@cais.cais.com (Charles Meredith) To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: CPT Message-ID: <199503100308.WAA19351@cais.cais.com> >Excellent job on the CPT. Like it. >Suggestion - where you list how to make submission, how about a >permanent short ad telling people how to subscribe to the BSE List? Where is the CPT? Chazz (not to be confused with Shazz <g>) ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:24:15 -0500 (EST) From: George Hammond <gstarrh@umich.edu> To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Quality Tension-Relief Products from USS Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950309213221.10261D-100000@london.biology.lsa.umich.edu> The USS would like to respond to the scurrilous and unfounded remark made by Harry Flashman, who is evidently the latest oppressor of hapless innocents at IND Werth. Recently this person wrote: > Dear Russ, I omit sundry slurs on the honor and virtue of the Imperial authorities > personal level, he's probably a very nice man. Why, I understand he was the > one who start that relief fund for Imperial officers who had been unmanned by > malfunctioning robotic sheep. What a guy!!!! > > Regards, > Harry The Universal Science and Services Office of Information would like to formally state that there are no, I repeat no, documented cases of permanent physical injury incurred due to mechanical failure or malfunction during the use, misuse or abuse, of our fine line of Robotic Pleasure Sheep (tm) products. All our Sheep are designed and built to the highest safety standards of organo-polymer tissue culture engineering, while still affording pleasurable and stimulating release of even the most intense physical pressures and tensions. Even in the case of total mechanical failure, the worst that can occur is the release of our patented Modulated Universal Coherent Undulatory Substance, a clear, tasteless, non-staining and non-toxic fluid that gives the Pleasure Sheep the unique rippling, hydrodynamic quality so highly esteemed by both male and female customers. In fact, I'm told by our marketing people that some of our frontier customers find this "test to destruction" something of a goal to shoot for, so to speak. Therefore, Mr. Flashman's ill-conceived remarks were a wildly inaccurate and irresponsible libel of a product that the USS is justifiably proud of. We can only imagine that the stress and strain of imposing his will on the unprotected citizens of Werth temporarily impaired the new Governor's reason and judgement. We hope that he will return to good mental health soon. As a gesture of good will, and in the hope that it will aid in his recovery, we will shortly be sending the Governor a complementary set of Deluxe Interactive Light Duty Orifices, the finest of our recently released line of office models, to be used for quick, temporary relief of the tensions and pressures of the workplace. Thank you for your attention, and remember, nothing brings smiles to the faces of hard-working colonists like a quality time with a Sheep! Baltazar Hepto, Coordinator USS Office of Information aka George Hammond ------------------------------ Date: 09 Mar 95 22:30:39 EST From: Wayne Alexander <71470.344@compuserve.com> To: BSE Digest <BSE-L@consensus.com> Subject: CPT Deadline Message-ID: <950310033038_71470.344_EHB111-1@CompuServe.COM> TO: All interested parties FM: Art Krieger, KriegerPress Re: Capellan Periphery Times The CPT is getting ready to go to press again during early April. If you want to see something published then either file it here, on the BSE Digest, or send it to me. The *ONLY* requirement is that it has to be in-charter, no OOC articles will be accepted. Some of you may have already received Vol. 14, No. 1 of the new CPT. I hope you liked it. I do give byline credit to reporters that want them known (ie, Joe Bob Briggs, "Ty" Meup, Walter Cranky, etc.) known. And, I don't edit articles for anything but spelling and *really* bad grammar, if I find it. :) I intend on publishing the PD list in every issue. What other things would you like to see included in each issue? Stargate list? What? Wayne ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 21:49:18 -0600 (CST) From: Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: CPT Deadline Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9503092119.A16538-0100000@pentagon.io.com> On 9 Mar 1995, Wayne Alexander wrote: > I intend on publishing the PD list in every issue. What other things > would you like to see included in each issue? Stargate list? What? A short note about this list and how to subscribe to it would be nice. A stargate listing (including operational status) would be great as would a the priorty market stuff. Kerry ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 21:53:35 -0600 (CST) From: Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: Quality Tension-Relief Products from USS Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9503092157.B16538-0100000@pentagon.io.com> On Thu, 9 Mar 1995, George Hammond wrote: > permanent physical injury incurred due to mechanical failure or > malfunction during the use, misuse or abuse, of our fine line of Robotic > Pleasure Sheep (tm) products. > All our Sheep are designed and built to the highest safety standards of > organo-polymer tissue culture engineering, while still affording > pleasurable and stimulating release of even the most intense physical Can this device be re-programmed for use as prey? Onboard lethal armament for defense? If so, we wish to acquire for entertainment purposes. K'zk Kasrith-kazereckii ------------------------------ Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 21:58:46 -0600 (CST) From: Kerry Harrison <kerry@io.com> To: BSE-L@consensus.com Subject: Re: Stargate trashing.... Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9503092111.C16538-0100000@pentagon.io.com> On Thu, 9 Mar 1995, Richard Gurley wrote: > Even if this theorem is proved false, there is still the proven > fact that the FGZ (cf) have just proven themselves to be quite expert in > the combat form known as "let's you and them fight!!!" At this point in > time, unless sanity prevails, the WCE and the QSN could easily become > entangled in unnecessary combat, simply to prove that the FGZ (cf) can > oh-so-easily manipulate your thoughts, leading everyone to believe that he > is defenseless, when actually he is acting like a tiger, stalking his prey. Sounds like what the humans call diplomacy and politics to us. K'zk Kasrith-kazereckii ------------------------------ Date: 09 Mar 95 23:43:31 EST From: Shannon Rundquist <75477.1627@compuserve.com> To: BSE LIST <BSE-L@consensus.com> Subject: Re: Porkamo stargate Message-ID: <950310044330_75477.1627_GHJ172-1@CompuServe.COM> Secretary Treyder >major warfleet (that stargate was the logical choice, as >far as distance was concerned) for "punitive" actions. I would advise replacing your tactical adviser before you get misled again. There is a BIG difference between 'logical' and 'obvious'. The stargate was the OBVIOUS choice, NOT the logical choice. This is not merely a semantic choice, but a reflection of accurate tactical analysis. Speaker Silver Cascade ------------------------------ End of BSE-L Digest 47 ********************** Up