Re: Greg Lindahl's attitude

From: tanbo@ix.netcom.com (mr.tan)

Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000

In <3p0ekp$dcl@news.xmission.com> llamas@xmission.com (Dances with Llamas)
writes:

>
>In article <3ovc18$h3d@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>,
>   tanbo@ix.netcom.com (mr.tan) wrote:
>>I'm new to this group, but this attitude shit is hilarious.
>>
>>My two cents:
>>
>>Greg is saying (I hate to put words in your mouth, but everyone else
>>seems to be doing it) Hey, I have a responsibility to my homepage
>>readers to let them know what I honestly think about a game including my
>>thoughts on cost.
>
>>Bottom line A: You can't make an editor *like* your game, or prevent him
>>from doing a negative review.  If he makes any valid criticisms, try to
>>fix it and re-submit it.
>
>I think that the sticking point is that Greg never played the game, and
>so it wasn't a review.  It was a one sentence description with a negative
>connotation.  It wasn't a great thing to put because he had never played
>the game, but at the same time, I hardly think it was so bad as to cause
>such an uproar.
>
>So...bottom line A doesn't really fit this situation.
>

Ok . . .  but I just have one question.   Did Greg ever play the game?

-mr.tan

References

Greg Linahl's attitude
tanbo@ix.netcom.com (mr.tan)
Fri, 12 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000
Re: Greg Linahl's attitude
llamas@xmission.com (Dances with Llamas)
Fri, 12 May 1995 00:00:00 +0000